Navigation

Service-Menü

Hauptmenü



Bereichsmenü

Autoren mit:

WGL Logo

PsychAuthors

Literaturliste von Dr. Tim Kühl

letzte Aktualisierung: 05.03.2024

Kühl, T. & Münzer, S. (2023). When pictures are not beneficial in multimedia learning: the case of threat-related pictures. Educational Psychology, 43(2-3), 155-172.

Navratil, S. D. & Kühl, T. (2023). Learning with self-generated drawings and the impact of learners' emotional states. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, No. 1286022.

Kühl, T., Fehringer, B. C. O. F. & Münzer, S. (2022). Unifying the ability-as-compensator and ability-as-enhancer hypotheses. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 1063-1095.

Kühl, T. & Wohninsland, P. (2022). Learning with the interactive whiteboard in the classroom: Its impact on vocabulary acquisition, motivation and the role of foreign language anxiety. Education and Information Technologies, 1-18.

Kühl, T. (2021). Prerequisite knowledge and time of testing in learning with animations and static pictures: Evidence for the expertise reversal effect. Learning and Instruction, 73, No. 101457.

Kühl, T. & Münzer, S. (2021). Learning about a serious disease: When a personalized message is harmful unless you are happy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 1-12.

Eitel, A. & Kühl, T. (2019). Editorial: Harmful or helpful to learning? The impact of seductive details on learning and instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 3-8.

Kühl, T. & Bertrams, A. (2019). Is learning with elaborative interrogation less desirable when learners are depleted? Frontiers in Psychology, 10, No. 707.

Kühl, T., Moersdorf, F., Römer, M. & Münzer, S. (2019). Adding emotionality to seductive details - Consequences for learning? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 48-61.

Kühl, T. & Münzer, S. (2019). The moderating role of additional information when learning with animations compared to static pictures. Instructional Science, 47(6), 659-677.

Navratil, S. D. & Kühl, T. (2019). Learning with elaborative interrogations and the impact of learners' emotional states. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(2), 218-227.

Kühl, T., Navratil, S. D. & Münzer, S. (2018). Animations and static pictures: The influence of prompting and time of testing. Learning and Instruction, 58, 201-209.

Kühl, T., Stebner, F., Navratil, S. C., Fehringer, B. C. O. F. & Muenzer, S. (2018). Text information and spatial abilities in learning with different visualizations formats. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(4), 561-577.

Münzer, S., Fehringer, B. C. O. F. & Kühl, T. (2018). Specificity of mental transformations involved in understanding spatial structures. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 40-50.

Navratil, S. D., Kühl, T. & Heidig, S. (2018). Why the cells look like that - The influence of learning with emotional design and elaborative interrogations. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, No. 1653.

Kühl, T. & Zander, S. (2017). An inverted personalization effect when learning with multimedia: The case of aversive content. Computers & Education, 108, 71-84.

Stebner, F., Kühl, T., Höffler, T. N., Wirth, J. & Ayres, P. (2017). The role of process information in narrations while learning with animations and static pictures. Computers & Education, 104, 34-48.

Zander, S., Wetzel, S., Kühl, T. & Bertel, S. (2017). Underlying processes of an inverted personalization effect in multimedia learning - An eye-tracking study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, No. 2202.

Eitel, A. & Kühl, T. (2016). Effects of disfluency and test expectancy on learning with text. Metacognition and Learning, 11(1), 107-121.

Münzer, S., Fehringer, B. C. O. F. & Kühl, T. (2016). Validation of a 3-factor structure of spatial strategies and relations to possession and usage of navigational aids. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 66-78.

Kühl, T., Eitel, A., Damnik, G. & Körndle, H. (2014). The impact of disfluency, pacing, and students' need for cognition on learning with multimedia. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 189-198.

Kühl, T., Eitel, A., Scheiter, K. & Gerjets, P. (2014). A call for an unbiased search for moderators in disfluency research: Reply to Oppenheimer and Alter (2014). Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 805-806.

Kühl, T., Scheiter, K. & Gerjets, P. (2012). Enhancing Learning from Dynamic and Static Visualizations by Means of Cueing. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 21(1), 71-88.

Kühl, T. (2011). Optimizing learning with dynamic and static visualizations to foster understanding in the natural sciences. Dissertation, Universität, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Tübingen.

Kühl, T., Proske, A., Damnik, G., Hilbig, A. & Körndle, H. (2011). Wissen durch informelles Lernen systematisch weitergeben: Das postgraduale Bildungsangebot aquwa: "Gestaltung arbeitsplatznaher Qualifizierung und Wissensaustausch". In W. Hacker, U. Pietrzyk & U. Debitz (Hrsg.), Wissen erfolgreich weitergeben - Lösungen für kleine und mittlere Unternehmen im demografischen Wandel (S. 149-156). Lengerich: Pabst.

Kühl, T., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P. & Edelmann, J. (2011). The influence of text modality on learning with static and dynamic visualizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 29-35.

Kühl, T., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P. & Gemballa, S. (2011). Can differences in learning strategies explain the benefits of learning from static and dynamic visualizations? Computers & Education, 56(1), 176-187.

Pfeiffer, V. D. I., Scheiter, K., Kühl, T. & Gemballa, S. (2011). Learning how to identify species in a situated learning scenario: Using dynamic-static visualizations to prepare students for their visit to the aquarium. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 7(2), 135-147.

Gerjets, P., Imhof, B., Kühl, T., Pfeiffer, V., Scheiter, K. & Gemballa, S. (2010). Using static and dynamic visualisations to support the comprehension of complex dynamic phenomena in the natural sciences. In L. Verschaffel, E. De Corte, T. de Jong & J. Elen (Eds.), Use of representations in reasoning and problem solving. Analysis and improvement (pp. 153-168). Abingdon: Routledge.



weiterführende Informationen

Weitere Informationen

Möchten Sie auch in die Datenbank aufgenommen werden, haben Sie Änderungswünsche an Ihrem vorhandenen Profil oder möchten Sie Literatur zur Aufnahme in PSYNDEX nachmelden, nehmen Sie bitte Kontakt zu uns auf.

Katja Trillitzsch
Leibniz-Institut für Psychologie (ZPID)
Universitätsring 15,
54296 Trier
Folgen Sie uns auf Twitter

Kontakt und Funktionen

URL der Seite: https://psychauthors.de/psychauthors/index.php?wahl=forschung&uwahl=psychauthors&uuwahl=p00754TK_pub